Is the Gospel of John a Gospel of Hate?

This appears to be the week of controversy.

Yes, some would say that the Gospel of John is a gospel of hate. Read the book closely and you may see why. An article that I read in my Greek Exegesis of the Gospel of John[1] class suggested that anti-Jewish sentiment is inherent in the text (through his constant use of “oi ioudaioi” which translates literally to “the Jews” and the negative light that he continually portrays them in). I’m inclined to disagree. I think that this argument about hatred stems from a super-sensitivity that we have towards any level of exclusivity, as well as a lack of appreciation for Jesus’ prophetic context and of course, the larger biblical context.

First, Jesus’ prophetic context. John makes it clear in the famed Prologue that for the remainder of the book, the Jesus you see will not be accepted. “He came to his own and his own did not receive him.” (John 1:11) This aspect of Jesus’ ministry is iterated over and over in this book and with good reason. If a man today traveled around teaching in churches that he himself was the Bread of life and that we needed to eat his flesh and drink his blood in order to be saved, we would probably call him a demon-possessed Samaritan too[2]! But it makes the most sense that “the Jews” in John’s narrative would not accept Christ. He doesn’t fit into the traditional system. He complicates any monotheistic faith’s view of God, especially in the Gospel of John where he makes numerous claims to divinity[3]. But if God is One, as the Shema[4] states, how does Jesus fit into that construct? We don’t have time here to go into what ends up being a debate that lasts hundreds of years but you get the point. Jesus’ claims are problematic for his audience, to say the least. But this doesn’t make Jesus a person of hate. Those who have misused this book to justify their racism and prejudice have done just that: misused this book. Anyone who uses the Scripture to oppress and degrade misuses the Gospel. Some may claim that the language of this Gospel goes against the larger construct of God’s love, but where do you get an idea of Christian love if you eschew the Gospel of John? John, in his Gospel and his epistles, has quite a bit to say about love including everybody's favorite misinterpreted verse: "God is love."(1 John 4:8b) That does not mean, "God is the embodiment of my definition of love." Instead, the author is saying, "God and how he interacts and has interacted with the world, specifically through the person of Jesus Christ, IS my definition of love." Your definition of Christian love should stem from the text, not some nebulous feel-good emotion that you call love.

Second, the larger biblical context and our super-sensitivity to exclusivity. Here is a fact in the study of religion: truly monotheistic[5] religions are necessarily exclusive. It’s just a fact. When Jesus claims to be the way, the truth and the life, he means it exclusively. That’s what he says in the next line: “No one comes to the Father except through me.” There’s no room for compromise. Realize what you inevitably claim when you claim to be Christian. People died and continue to die today because of this fact. This is one of the reason why it angers me to see “Christians” soften on this point, suggesting that there are other ways to God without Christ. But it also sheds light on John’s narrative. “The Jews” are not only the Jewish people in the narrative, but they represent the majority of mankind. A lot of people see faith in Christ as ridiculous for these reasons. They see “irreconcilable contradictions” and that, presumably, keeps them from faith. We see similar sentiments in the Jews of John’s narrative. We have people who see Jesus and his claims as contrary to the religious status quo so they seek to, and eventually do, kill him. But that’s not a story of hate. It’s a story of humanity. We seek to destroy what we do not understand. The Jews are not some group of "others" who rejected Christ (which we know we would never do, right?) They are just like us. As a matter of fact, Origen, a great theologian in the early church, would later identify Christians as "Israel according to the Spirit", referring back to Paul's differentiation of "Israel according to the flesh" in 1 Corinthians 10. According to him, the Church is the new, true Israel. When you read "the Jews", think of yourself and your own reactions to Christ's claims.

            So that’s something to think about and a question you’ve got to answer for yourself. Is the Gospel of John a gospel of hate? More importantly, is the Gospel of Jesus Christ a gospel of hate? To me, the Gospel, when read with the guiding of the Holy Spirit, is revealed to be not only a gospel of love, but a gospel of true love. After all the definition of love is in John 3:16: “For God loved the world in this way, that he gave his only-begotten Son, so that everyone believing in him might not perish, but might have eternal life.” That’s the root of our love, brothers and sisters. The root is not a nebulous view of “niceness” and “inclusivity”. It is a powerful, life-changing compound of grace and truth, guided and empowered by the Spirit of God Himself.

Note: To all of my beloved readers, thanks to each of you for taking the time to engage with my thought. It wouldn't be a community without you. Following in Origen and Augustine's footsteps, I'm not a fan of individual Scriptural interpretation but instead the collective literal and spiritual interpretation of the Church. Tell your friends!

---

[1] My favorite of all of my classes. The Greek of John is pretty easy, but the book is super rich. And also hilarious because Jesus is just so awesomely hard-core. Any conception of a “soft, hippie Christ” is completely blown out of the water in this book.

[2] My favorite of all of the insults in the book. It shows the social and religious enmity between the two groups (Jews and Samaritans) which goes way back.

[3] His “I am” statements, his forgiveness of sins, his acceptance of worship, his literal claiming that He and the Father are one….If you want a Jesus that plays games, the book of John is not the book to read. Too bad you, as an honest Christian, don’t have that option! Wrestle with it.

[4] Hear, O Israel: the Lord is our God, the Lord is one. (Deuteronomy 6:4)

[5] This is contrasted with henotheism, which is a system of many gods where one is seen as the “king of the gods” or the only one to be truly worshiped, and, of course, pantheism and polytheism.